A Malaysian fresh graduate has drawn widespread attention online after alleging that their probation period was abruptly shortened without proper notification by their employer.
In a post shared on Threads, the individual revealed they were initially offered a three-month probationary position at a company. However, after just one and a half months on the job, the Human Resource Department allegedly informed them that their contract had been terminated and advised them to resign.
According to the post, the graduate sought clarification regarding their performance and was reportedly told that their work was satisfactory but deemed slow. The situation has since sparked discussion on workplace practices, particularly involving young employees navigating their first roles in the corporate environment.
After weighing their options, the graduate said they intended to negotiate with the company in hopes of completing the remainder of the probation period. Many observers noted that probation is typically designed to allow room for improvement, feedback and structured evaluation, raising questions about whether due process was followed.
The post quickly attracted responses from netizens, with many urging the individual not to submit a resignation if it was not voluntary. Several advised compiling written evidence and documentation before lodging a complaint with the Labour Department.
One commenter asserted that forcing an employee to resign without consent would be unlawful, while another recommended requesting a formal termination letter on official company letterhead detailing any payments or compensation. Such documentation, they pointed out, would be crucial for claims under the Employment Insurance System.
Others stressed that employers should provide constructive feedback during probation to enable staff to improve, highlighting that the period exists precisely for assessment and development rather than abrupt dismissal.
